Imagine a compliance system costs $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a lot?
The replacement it makes will determine the final answer.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection in a tangled technology landscape, $12,000 could be well-spent. The calculation would be different in the event that a small group of people could collect the same amount of evidence in just one or two minutes per month.
It’s a great method to begin your search for the best Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking which platform offers the most features. Consider how many hours and time these tools can help save your company.
Automation has an economic break-even At this
It’s not intrinsically good or evil. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a company growing in technology with hundreds of employees, many cloud environments, a variety of applications, and constant access modifications. Manually collecting evidence could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence could easily justify the expense.
Now think about a 10-person company making preparations for its first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this difference. A modern platform may provide vast capabilities, but these capabilities will only be of value in the event that an organization really requires they.
Compare Architecture with Brands, not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are established solutions for compliance based on automation and integrations. As such, comparing their supported frameworks including integrations, service contracts, and individual quotations are useful for businesses seeking that approach.
You’ll need to decide on an additional thing before you do. Does your business have an interest in an integration-driven system for compliance? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some companies prefer to collect evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not all follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors have a place in the market, with the same focus on automation. There are other platforms that concentrate on organization over an extensive network of connectivity.
CertAssist falls into the latter category. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central work area, gives editable policies and evidence guidance, and allows auditors to examine evidence submitted via access to only read-only.
It doesn’t set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers upload their own evidence.
Factor System Access Into the Decision
Eliminating integrations has a distinct disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence by hand.
The compliance software does not require integration, and it can be used without having to establish connection to the operating environment.
The architectures of either are not superior to each other. The question is which option is most appropriate for your company.
CertAssist targets teams between five to 200 members. Its pricing is publicized rather than having to make an initial sales call to determine the first figure. The price for the initial launch is $225 per month, that’s a difference from the normal price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Be In Control
The requirements for a start-up with a staff of 10 are not necessarily identical to those of a company with 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple but a lighter platform might make sense. When systems, employees frameworks, and requirements for evidence increase, the financials could eventually favor greater automation. Let complexity play a role when purchasing compliance technology.
Do not pay for 50 integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. Pay for them when manually doing the tasks they replace becomes the most expensive option.